affiliate marketing

Blackberry Messenger Vs Apple iMessage

Share on :



Since the emergence of IOS 5 Beta for iPhone 3G to the top, often comparisons by Apple and RIM fanboy fanboy compare on both features. Therefore, some of Antihackerlink Repository contributor has made a comparison chart and will slightly discuss it here.
Comparison testing was conducted on the system as follows:
Blackberry ® Pearl 9105 5.0.0.831, 6.0.0.73 Fuel
16GB iPhone 4 5 FU IOS Beta (Registered UDID)

From some of the results of the above comparison, it can be concluded that actually the function / purpose and iMessage fuel is the same, although with different concepts and features. From the comparison that appears above, several features stand out in some way, we will discuss a little bit here.

We will discuss problems sending files, and backup management character limit. If you like the community, Blackberry Messenger and Apple iMessage still be able to handle your needs, both fuel and iMessage, providing for the needs of the group chat feature or the so-called Group Messaging. So you can have discussions in a time with several people simultaneously. However, when we perform the test, there are some disadvantages of iMessage, when you’ve made a group with a certain number of people, and when you want to include new members in that group, you must create a new group, and can not be included in the group already exists.

Then, for the feature sending files, while this iMessage can only send files of pictures and videos only, with no file size limit in a single send. However, for your fuel users, there are limits in a single file limitation tell if you use Blackberry Messenger protocol.

For the text messaging feature, although not using SMS channels, indirectly some of the features in the fuel delivery of messages (Blackberry Messenger) is also in limiting the transmission of characters (consciously or not Blackberry users?), But when we do testing on iMessage, not there is a limit of characters in one pengirman.

That we salute was, that in the stretcher iCloud system by Apple. If there are 2 or more IOS 5 Device that uses an email to synchronize to the server iCloud, then when the first device to sync to the server iCloud, then the other devices will also be ter-synchronization. For example, IOS Device A sync to the server iCloud, and recent data in the form of data iMessage, then the other devices that use the same email will appear as well as in the IOS Device A.

For the conclusion, if you are one who wants to always be active in social networks, good for the current fuel still remains superior even though there are limitations on some sides, but if you are a person in need of mobility and coverage broad enough (no matter where your data can in access), you deserve to use a feature in Apple’s existing iMessage.Since the emergence of IOS 5 Beta for iPhone 3G to the top, often comparisons by Apple and RIM fanboy fanboy compare on both features. Therefore, some of Antihackerlink Repository contributor has made a comparison chart and will slightly discuss it here.

Comparison testing was conducted on the system as follows:
Blackberry ® Pearl 9105 5.0.0.831, 6.0.0.73 Fuel
16GB iPhone 4 5 FU IOS Beta (Registered UDID)

From some of the results of the above comparison, it can be concluded that actually the function / purpose and iMessage fuel is the same, although with different concepts and features. From the comparison that appears above, several features stand out in some way, we will discuss a little bit here.

We will discuss problems sending files, and backup management character limit. If you like the community, Blackberry Messenger and Apple iMessage still be able to handle your needs, both fuel and iMessage, providing for the needs of the group chat feature or the so-called Group Messaging. So you can have discussions in a time with several people simultaneously. However, when we perform the test, there are some disadvantages of iMessage, when you’ve made a group with a certain number of people, and when you want to include new members in that group, you must create a new group, and can not be included in the group already exists.

Then, for the feature sending files, while this iMessage can only send files of pictures and videos only, with no file size limit in a single send. However, for your fuel users, there are limits in a single file limitation tell if you use Blackberry Messenger protocol.

For the text messaging feature, although not using SMS channels, indirectly some of the features in the fuel delivery of messages (Blackberry Messenger) is also in limiting the transmission of characters (consciously or not Blackberry users?), But when we do testing on iMessage, not there is a limit of characters in one pengirman.

That we salute was, that in the stretcher iCloud system by Apple. If there are 2 or more IOS 5 Device that uses an email to synchronize to the server iCloud, then when the first device to sync to the server iCloud, then the other devices will also be ter-synchronization. For example, IOS Device A sync to the server iCloud, and recent data in the form of data iMessage, then the other devices that use the same email will appear as well as in the IOS Device A.

For the conclusion, if you are one who wants to always be active in social networks, good for the current fuel still remains superior even though there are limitations on some sides, but if you are a person in need of mobility and coverage broad enough (no matter where your data can in access), you deserve to use a feature in Apple’s existing iMessage.

0 comments on Blackberry Messenger Vs Apple iMessage :

Post a Comment and Don't Spam!

Do Follow Blog.. Leave a Comment..
Don't Spam..

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...